the Filioque
ConceptPhilosophyTheology
aka Filioque, filioque
Jay Dyer critiques the Filioque controversy by asserting that its introduction was driven more by geopolitical motives than theological ones, while arguing against the Thomistic interpretation and emphasizing the lack of support for this doctrine in the works of St. Basil, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the need for substantial study to grasp its nuances.
Sources
Discussed in
- videoHEATED Debate! The Paradigm Challenge: Papism, Byzantine Occultism & Illuminism
- videoCandace Owens VS Andrew Wilson, Papacy Refuted & Brotherhood of Eternal Love: Boomer LSD Cults!
- videoCandace Owens VS Andrew Wilson, Islam, Hasan Piker, Evolution, Kant & Thomism & Death, LSD CULTS
- videoOPEN DEBATE/QnA! Godlogic/Evangelicals, Catholics & Muslims are ALL WRONG!
- videoHEATED DEBATE! âjesusandwhatnotâ Vs Jay Dyer! His âGotchaâ Fails LOL
- videoEVANGELICAL PSY OP: I AM KGB: WEF STATISM & Circular Economy, CIA & Ukraine SCHISM
Related subjects
HermeticismSt. BasilvictimhoodLibyanoCatholicsSoviet Union1960s countercultureAI BotsDeathJake the Muslim metaphysicianthe ResurrectioniconoclastsWestminster ConfessionMaximus the ConfessorEd FazerNicene CreedSaint HippolytusWeather UndergroundAugustinian ideasbaptismPope LeoVaticanRosa KoireChalk.commessianic dilemmaDavid WoodmagisteriumMormonismtheological debatesMaryCritique of Pure Reasoninternal critiquepantheismCandace Owensphilosophy courseparadigm-level argumentationVatican IIdivine revelationAugustinePlatonism