Cogito, ergo sum
ConceptPhilosophy
aka cogito, cogito ergo sum
Jay critiques the validity of 'Cogito, ergo sum', stating that it does not prove anything and highlighting the reductionist nature of equating self with intellect.
Chain 3 of 3 pieces
- 2024-01-06MASSIVE Catholic Debates (Lofton Vs Ybarra): Epistemology Debates (Thomism), Atheism & Much More!4:38:244:39:10
Jay discusses Descartes' cogito, suggesting that it could be interpreted in a way that argues for God's existence instead of human existence.
Led intonatural theology Jay critiques the cogito, suggesting it relies on assumptions that are not self-evident and critiques from various philosophers are significant.
- 2024-04-02Internal Monologues?? Sam Hyde, Tik Tok Cults, Starseeds, Therions, Adult Babies & MORE! -Jay Dyer45:16
Jay critiques the validity of 'Cogito, ergo sum', stating that it does not prove anything and highlighting the reductionist nature of equating self with intellect.
Discussed in
Sources
Related subjects
NestorianismOctorum FideJesusGavin Ortlunddivine simplicityNew TestamentPope Francisatheismheavenly bitcoinOperation Car WashepistemologyThomas AquinasApostolic Traditionthe transcendentGnosticismNostra AetateSynod of Pistoiahood healersTrent Horneiconographyenergy vampiresApostolic SuccessionLatin MasstheosisGodCyril of AlexandriaDenzingerClerical CelibacyMichael LoftinpresuppositionalismISISVatican IISpiritual DelusionDavid ErhanEunomiusJoseph SmithDavid ArahmanMatt DillahuntyFather DeaconLarry Stanley