Index

Cogito, ergo sum

ConceptPhilosophy

aka cogito, cogito ergo sum

Jay critiques the validity of 'Cogito, ergo sum', stating that it does not prove anything and highlighting the reductionist nature of equating self with intellect.

Chain 3 of 3 pieces

  1. Jay discusses Descartes' cogito, suggesting that it could be interpreted in a way that argues for God's existence instead of human existence.

  2. Jay critiques the cogito, suggesting it relies on assumptions that are not self-evident and critiques from various philosophers are significant.

  3. Jay critiques the validity of 'Cogito, ergo sum', stating that it does not prove anything and highlighting the reductionist nature of equating self with intellect.

Discussed in

Sources

Related subjects