People cannot grasp this. No - it’s x is the necessary condition of y, y therefore x. Far…
People cannot grasp this. No - it’s x is the necessary condition of y, y therefore x. Far more radical claim. God of the gaps is 1000 times a weaker claim.
Chain 1 of 1
- Jay Dyer
The God of the gaps argument is a significantly weaker claim.
“God of the gaps is 1000 times a weaker claim.”
Subjects
1Jay defends the transcendental argument for the existence of God (TAG) as a necessary condition rather than a simple reliance on unexplained phenomena.