Thread: Even if one knew nothing about a case (which I don’t think is true in the debate), it’s s…
Even if one knew nothing about a case (which I don’t think is true in the debate), it’s still 100% possible to refute a person’s theories if they are logically fallacious non sequiturs and conjecture. / that’s irrelevant to my tweet / I didn’t defend the fed narrative per se / where was evidence of patsy? / Why are you lying? when did I say just believe the FBI? / So you admit it’s possible?
Chain 1 of 1
- Jay Dyer
One can refute theories that are logically fallacious.
“it’s still 100% possible to refute a person’s theories if they are logically fallacious non sequiturs and conjecture.”