Jay Dyer vs. an Atheist: Can Atheism Ground Induction?

Atheism can't account for the uniformity of nature that induction assumes.

“On what basis do you expect the future to resemble the past?”

Induction is justified pragmatically: it works, so we keep using it.

Pragmatism is circular: you assume uniformity to justify believing in uniformity.

“That's the very thing in question.”

Which God, though? The Trinity is no less arbitrary than any other deity.

The Trinity grounds unity and plurality at once; bare theism and monistic systems cannot.

That's just assertion.

Materialism still owes us an account of the laws of logic, which are immaterial and universal.